At this weekend’s Cancer and Evolution meeting, one of the highlights was a talk from a husband-and-wife team of biologists at Rochester University about naked mole rats. As far as scientists can tell, naked mole rats don’t get cancer, despite living up to 30 years. That’s pretty remarkable when you consider that another rodent–the lab mouse–has a 47% cancer rate during its brief, two-year life.

So a number of researchers have been searching the biology of naked mole rats for their secret. The Rochester scientists may have found a crucial ingredient in their cancer defense. And, by happy coincidence, Nature is publishing their report today. That’s the subject of my “Matter” column this week. Check it out.

Originally published June 19, 2013. Copyright 2013 Carl Zimmer.

The New York Times, June 19, 2013

Link

The laboratory of Vera Gorbunova and Andrei Seluanov, a husband-and-wife team of biologists at the University of Rochester, has the feel of a petting zoo. They maintain colonies of several species of rodents — some familiar, like mice and guinea pigs, and some much more exotic, like blind mole rats from Israel and naked mole rats from East Africa.

Amusing children with furry creatures is not their goal, however. The biology of animals is mysteriously diverse, and lurking within it may be clues to new kinds of medicine.

Continue reading “A Homely Rodent May Hold Cancer-Fighting Clues”

Millions of years ago, some bats gave up their old habits of hunting for insects and tried something new: drinking blood. These creatures evolved into today’s vampire bats, and it’s mind-boggling to explore all the ways that they evolved to make the most of their sanguine meal.

A lot of the adaptations are easy enough to see with the naked eye. Vampire bats have Dracula-style teeth, for example, which they use to puncture the tough hide of cows. When they open up a crater-shaped wound, they dip in their long tongue, which contains two straw-shaped ducts that take up the blood. Continue reading “Dracula’s Children”

Say the letters “H M” to a neuroscientist, and chances are he or she will nod knowingly. H.M. was a man who died in 2008. His full name was Henry Molaison, and a surgical procedure in the 1950s left him without much of his memory. Studies on his mind laid the groundwork for our understanding of memory today. In tomorrow’s issue of the Wall Street Journal, I review a remarkable biography of Molaison, written by MIT neuroscientist Suzanne Corkin, who studied him from their first meeting in 1962 till his death–and beyond. While it’s not a perfect, it is–pardon the pun–a memorable one.

Originally published June 14, 2013. Copyright 2013 Carl Zimmer.

The Wall Street Journal, June 14, 2013

Link

In 1962, a young graduate student at McGill University named Suzanne Corkin met a 35-year-old man named Henry Molaison. Molaison and his mother had come to Montreal from their home in Connecticut so that Ms. Corkin and her colleagues could run a week-long series of psychological tests on him. Molaison was a sweet, cooperative subject. Ms. Corkin and Molaison talked a lot that week, mostly about Molaison’s childhood. Beyond his early years, though, Molaison’s recollections faded away.

The reason was both simple and profound. As a child, Molaison had suffered from severe epilepsy. In 1953, a surgeon took the drastic step of removing the part of his brain that was believed to be the cause.

Continue reading “The Man Who Wasn’t There”