Life Finding A Way

On a snowy February afternoon almost exactly a year ago, I took my final pre-pandemic road trip. I drove to Albany, where I met a pair of wildlife biologists named Carl Herzog and Katelyn Ritzko. Together we traveled on into the Adirondacks, stopping at the end of a road in the woods. Getting out of the car, we hiked a snow-covered trail until we reached a half-frozen stream. There we stopped to suit up in neoprene chest waders. We put on helmets, switched on headlamps, and stepped into the stream to make our way into a flooded graphite mine. 

“Tripping and falling is the biggest threat,” Herzog said as the darkness closed around us. “You don’t ever want to touch the ceiling.”

Continue reading “Friday’s Elk, February 19, 2021”

We’re getting down to the one-month-left mark before my new book comes out on March 9. It’s called Life’s Edge: The Search for What It Means To Be Alive

The book is a travelogue across the familiar territory of life as we know it into the strange borderlands between the living and the non-living. It features a huge cast of characters, including slime molds that solve mazes, hibernating bats deep in graphite mines, hungry pythons, tardigrades abandoned on the moon, and the enigma that is Covid-19. Publisher’s Weekly calls Life’s Edge “a pop science tour de force.”

Goodreads is running a giveaway for Life’s Edge this month. Visit this page by March 1 and click the “Enter Giveaway” button for a chance to win one of fifteen finished hardcovers. (Only U.S. residents are eligible, I’m afraid.)

I’ll have more updates on radio appearances and other events for LIfe’s Edge that I’ll share in upcoming newsletters. In the meantime, you can pre-order it here.

 

The Vexing Variants

A year ago, we were just getting to know a single strain of coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-2. Now its evolutionary tree has branched into thousands of lineages of variants. A few of them are now posing daunting challenges to the world’s efforts to get ahead of the pandemic. I spent a lot of the past month trying to keep up with this astonishing episode of evolution in action.

The variant that we know best was first found in England. Nicknamed “the UK variant” or the “Kent strain” by some, it officially goes by the name B.1.1.7. Jonathan Corum and I took it apart (visually at least) to show what we know about how its mutations turned it into a fast-spreading version of the coronavirus.

B.1.1.7 is still mutating, and scientists are worried that it may gain new mutations that will make it not only more contagious, but harder to control. In England, scientists have found samples of B.1.1.7 that have gained a new mutation that experiments suggest could make it harder to rein in with vaccines or treat with monoclonal antibodies.

It’s difficult to tell right away just how dangerous these new variants are. In California, for example, one lineage of coronaviruses has swiftly become more common in places like Los Angeles. Scientists are still figuring out if it has some biological features that makes it more contagious, rather than just getting spread more by chance. I’m keeping an eye on this variant, known as B.1.429, and will let you know if it’s a variant of serious concern.

Unfortunately, as these mutants zoom across the world, the United States and many other countries are not well-equipped to track them. We don’t have a federal mandate or a nationally organized system for getting coronavirus samples quickly sequenced and analyzed. We’re flying blind into a storm of variants. Fortunately, the new director of the CDC is ramping up more sequencing, but experts say we still need to do a better job.

Even as variants emerge, vaccines remain an essential weapon for fighting the pandemic. Experiments suggest that vaccines can work well against B.1.1.7. And Israel is offering some real-world support for that view. B.1.1.7 is already predominant there, but an aggressive vaccination campaign has led to marked declines in cases and hospitalizations among people over 60, the first group to get vaccinated.

But another variant first found in South Africa, called B.1.351, could prove more challenging. Johnson & Johnson and Novavax both found that the protection from their vaccines wasn’t quite as strong in South African trials than elsewhere.

It’s important to stop and marvel at the fact that in about a year, vaccine designers have demonstrated that eight different vaccines can protect people against Covid-19. The efficacy of the vaccines varies enormously, from about 50 percent to 95. But they’re all vastly better than zero.

The blazing success that scientists have experienced over the past year can make us complacent about how hard it is to make a vaccine. Johnson & Johnson has demonstrated their vaccine has an efficacy rate of 72 percent in the United States and is widely expected to get emergency authorization by the end of February. But it’s not clear yet how many doses they’ll be able to deliver right after that–at a moment when the country is desperate for as many doses as it can get.

We should also offer a tip of the hat to Merck, which abandoned not one but two vaccines after early clinical trials delivered disappointing results in January. Along with the University of Queensland and Sanofi’s failed attempts, that comes to four abandoned vaccines on the path out of the pandemic.

As more and more vaccines start getting injected into millions of people each day, Jonathan Corum and I have created a set of illustrations to show how they work.

While vaccines have the potential to rein in the pandemic, we desperately need better drugs to stop infections early–and will continue to need them in the months to come. A year after the pandemic started, the race for a potent antiviral has proven frustrating compared to the success of vaccines.

On the front page of last Sunday’s paper, I explored why the two lines of research have turned out so differently. It’s hard to make a new drug from scratch, and it can also be challenging to test existing drugs to see if they can be repurposed for Covid-19. But the struggle has been hampered by a lack of organization, leading to lots of small trials that often fail to recruit patients and a paucity of big, well-designed trials that can settle once and for all whether potentially promising drugs actually work. But some new initiatives from NIH and the FDA could spur the development of potent new drugs and the start of potent trials for old ones.

It was kind of crazy to look at last week’s issues and see stories I had written or helped to write on the front page three days in a row. I will be quite happy to move deeper into the newspaper. That will be a sign that the pandemic is finally behind us all.

 


That’s all for now. Stay safe!
 

My next book is Life’s Edge: Searching for What It Means to Be Alive. It’s coming out in March 2021, but you can pre-order it now. You can find information and ordering links for my thirteen other books here. You can also follow me on Twitter, Facebook, Goodreads, and LinkedIn. If someone forwarded this email to you, you can subscribe to it here.

Best wishes, Carl

Originally published February 6, 2021. Copyright 2021 Carl Zimmer.

I never looked forward to the first Friday’s Elk of the year like this one. When I reread 2020’s first newsletter, it feels as if it comes from an alternate universe, where tales of human evolution and monarch butterflies weren’t crowded out by a planetary shock brought on by a virus. It’s weird to realize that by the time I was writing that newsletter in January 2020, the coronavirus was a few months old, spreading through China and beyond. It didn’t even have a name yet, but the die for 2020 was already cast.

I spent December 2020 reporting on the pandemic, as I have since March. This final month of the year gave me a chance to reflect on where we’ve come in Year One C.E. (Covid Era), and what Year Two C.E. will be like.

When I started the coronavirus vaccine tracker with Jonathan Corum back in June, it felt like a convenient way to keep tabs on assorted projects just getting underway. But it quickly evolved into a combined chronicle and encyclopedia of what will be remembered as one of the most important episodes in the history of science. One by one, vaccines went into clinical trials. Some stalled, and one was abandoned.

But others progressed to the large-scale Phase 3 studies that can show if they’re safe and effective. In November, Pfizer and BioNTech provided the first evidence that a vaccine could indeed fight the coronavirus. Moderna soon followed, as did AstraZeneca. In Russia, Sputnik V showed promise, while China’s Sinopharm and Sinovac candidates looked as if they might work–although the detailed data from their Phase 3 trials have yet to come out. Country after country began granting emergency authorization or outright approval.

Jonathan kept deploying new design skills to keep up. We added maps to show where people are getting the vaccines. We created a collection explanatory illustrations to show how each vaccine works. (Here’s AstraZenecaJohnson & JohnsonModernaNovavaxPfizer-BioNTechSinopharm, and Sinovac.)

December brought photographs of people getting vaccinated across the United States and in other countries. I had dreamed of such a moment in the spring, but I considered it a fantasy to indulge rather than a firm prediction. Incredibly, though, the vaccines turned out to work very well.

At least they worked in the careful confines of a clinical trial. But vaccines don’t save lives. Vaccination campaigns do. The first three weeks of vaccinations have fallen catastrophically short of promised targets. Last month Operation Warp Speed leaders said that 20 million people would be vaccinated across the United States by now. As of December 30, the CDC has recorded fewer than 2.8 million Americans getting a shot.

Strained public health care systems are one reason for the delay. It’s a bizarre waste of resources to spend over ten billion dollars developing vaccines, and then set aside just a few hundred million to help with distribution. It didn’t help matters that the first vaccines to get authorized required ultracold freezing.

When it comes to distribution and cost, there are better vaccines in development–vaccines that only require one shot instead of two, that cost only a few dollars per dose, that can be kept refrigerated instead of frozen, that come in pills or sprays instead of shots. In 2021, I’ll be following these up-and-comers on the vaccine tracker. But they have yet to go through trials to prove they’re safe and effective. Going into 2021, we have to ask, who will want to risk getting a placebo rather than lining up for the real thing? If we’re lucky–again–it may be possible for vaccine developers to skip the placebos and measure the success of new vaccines with nothing but a blood test.

Meanwhile, the virus has rebounded to spring-like levels both in the United States and beyond. More people getting sick means more replicating viruses. More replication means more mutations. And more mutations mean more opportunities for the coronavirus to change in dangerous ways.

In December, a variant emerged in the United Kingdom with 23 mutations distinguishing it from the first SARS-CoV-2 samples found in Wuhan a year ago. Some of those mutations appear to have turned it into a far more contagious virus. I’ve been helping cover the spread of B.1.1.7, which was first detected this Tuesday in the United States. It could potentially lift the winter surge to even greater heights, requiring even stricter controls to slow its spread. Dramatically increasing vaccination could potentially spare many future victims of B.1.1.7. But if our slow rollout so far is any guide, we may not be up to the challenge.

I’m still guardedly optimistic that summer 2021 will bring back some of the joys we learned to do without in 2020. I think prognostications from reporters like Donald McNeil Jr.and Ed Yong are well considered. But this virus has exploited our assumptions and our wishful thinking so many times already that I am not buying airplane tickets any time soon. For the next few months, I will instead stay at home and continue to help chronicle the exhaustingly interesting news.

That’s all for now. Stay safe!

My next book is Life’s Edge: Searching for What It Means to Be Alive. It’s coming out in March 2021, but you can pre-order it nowYou can find information and ordering links for my thirteen other books here. You can also follow me on TwitterFacebookGoodreads, and LinkedIn. If someone forwarded this email to you, you can subscribe to it here.

Best wishes, Carl

Originally published January 1, 2021. Copyright 2021 Carl Zimmer.

It’s just a few weeks since I sat down to write my last newsletter, and yet it feels like another century of history has elapsed. The United States is skyrocketing back to the worst rates of hospitalizations and deaths of the spring. On December 3 alone, 2,857 Americans died. That’s just shy of the total number of people who died on 9/11–a disaster that still scars us 19 years later. As winter sets in and people stay inside more, things are only going to get worse. I have no idea how deep the scars from this pandemic will run.

It is deeply disorienting to spend this terrible time reporting indisputably good news. When I sent out November’s newsletter, Pfizer had just announced that the efficacy of its vaccine was over 90 percent, which was pretty staggering. Since then, a subsequent analysis of more cases of Covid-19 in their trial zeroed in on a figure of 95 percent. Moderna’s vaccine turned out to have an efficacy rate at 94.5 percent. The newest look at the trial for Sputnik V from Russia puts theirs at 91 percent. AstraZeneca, at least in one version of its dosing, is 90 percent. Continue reading “Friday’s Elk, December 5, 2020”

First Draft of History!

I was planning to send out the November issue of this newsletter on the first Friday of the month, as I typically do. But nonstop cable-news viewing got in the way. And as soon as I could pry my eyes away from the electoral drama, there was vaccine news to report. Not just another vaccine going into clinical trials, but the first trial to deliver preliminary data about whether a coronavirus vaccine works.

And it looks like it does!

Pfizer and BioNTech reported that an analysis of 94 cases of Covid-19 in their volunteers led to an estimate that their vaccine is over 90 percent effective. Yes. 90. Now, it’s entirely possible that the true effectiveness of the vaccine will be lower. But no one knew if coronavirus vaccines would work at all, and many folks who did were saying that 50 percent efficacy would be nice. So, at one of the worst stages of this pandemic (163,402  new cases on November 12 alone), this is some truly good news.

Here’s the story of the announcement, which I co-authored with David Gelles and Katie Thomas. Thomas and I followed up the following day with answers to some of the questions people are asking about these results, and the state of vaccine trials more generally. A couple days later, I talked with Michael Barbaro on The Daily about what this milestone means for getting vaccines for the coronavirus.

The Pfizer results have, I suspect, popped the vaccine news cork. On Wednesday, two days after Pfizer’s announcement, Russia announced their Sputnik V vaccine was just as effective, based on…just 20 cases. With Andrew Kramer, The Times’s Moscow bureau chief, I tried to make sense of the announcement. And I expect starting next week, we will have even more vaccine trial news–stay tuned!
 


“Chaos and Confusion”

While I’m happy to help deliver good news, it’s also important to keep our eyes wide open to the shortcomings in our search for a vaccine and the trouble we may face in the months to come. Here’s a story I wrote about the last time the United States rolled out a pandemic vaccine–for a new strain of influenza in 2009–and how we have lost a lot of the leadership that was so essential to making sure it was safe. In another story, I wrote about how we all need to prepare for “chaos and confusion”–the words of one vaccine expert–when coronavirus vaccines roll out this spring. 

The Coronavirus Unveiled

Structural biology is the study of living shapes. It’s a pretty esoteric field, but the pandemic has suddenly brought it to the world’s attention. Scientists are unveiling the shape of the coronavirus down to individual atoms. Here’s a feature I wrote on what we’re learning and how it could lead to new vaccine and treatments for Covid-19. It’s graced with gorgeous videos and pictures that will give you a grudging admiration for this tiny killer.

A Nobel for CRISPR

Just a few years ago, I struggled to get magazine editors as excited as I was about a new DNA-editing technology called CRISPR. But it soon soared to fame. And now this year’s Nobel Prize in Chemistry goes to two pioneers of CRISPR–Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier. Here’s the Times story on the win, which I co-authored with Katherine Wu and Elian Peltier.

By coincidence, I had just finished writing a review about a new book on CRISPR, Editing Humanity, for the New York Times Book Review. They published it later the same day. Warning: it’s hard to review a book about gee-whiz science in the middle of a pandemic that is showing us that science–on its own–can’t save us from ourselves. The Center for Genetics and Society went so far as to call my review “peevish.” It’s the first time I’ve had a review of a review! 

That’s it for now. Stay safe. Zoom your family for Thanksgiving. Let’s not make things any easier for this virus.

My next book is Life’s Edge: Searching for What It Means to Be Alive. It’s coming out in March 2021, but you can pre-order it nowYou can find information and ordering links for my thirteen other books here. You can also follow me on TwitterFacebookGoodreads, and LinkedIn. If someone forwarded this email to you, you can subscribe to it here.

Best wishes, Carl

Originally published November 13, 2020. Copyright 2020 Carl Zimmer.