The New York Times, May 23, 2025

Link

In April, a team of astronomers announced that they might — just might — have found signs of life on a planet over 120 light-years from Earth. The mere possibility of extraterrestrial life was enough to attract attention worldwide. It also attracted intense scrutiny from other astronomers.

Over the past month, researchers have independently analyzed the data, which suggested that the planet, called K2-18b, has a molecule in its atmosphere that could have been created by living organisms. Three different analyses have all reached the same conclusion: They see no compelling evidence for life on K2-18b.

Continue reading “New Studies Dismiss Signs of Life on Distant Planet”

The New York Times, May 7, 2025

Link

In the early 2000s, a coronavirus infecting bats jumped into raccoon dogs and other wild mammals in southwestern China. Some of those animals were sold in markets, where the coronavirus jumped again, into humans. The result was the SARS pandemic, which spread to 33 countries and claimed 774 lives. A few months into it, scientists discovered the coronavirus in mammals known as palm civets sold in a market at the center of the outbreak.

Continue reading “Genetic Study Retraces the Origins of Coronaviruses in Bats”

The New York Times, May 5, 2025 (with Emily Anthes)

Link

President Trump signed an executive order on Monday evening to further restrict experiments on pathogens and toxins that could make them more harmful.

For over a decade, scientists have debated the risks and benefits of so-called “gain of function” research. They’ve long tinkered with viruses and bacteria to endow them with new functions like producing insulin for people with diabetes. Some researchers have modified bird flu viruses in order to figure out which mutations might be crucial for producing pandemic strains that could spread among people.

Continue reading “Trump Executive Order Restricts ‘Gain of Function’ Research on Pathogens”

The New York Times, May 2, 2025 (with William J. Broad, Kenneth Chang, and Katrina Miller)

Link

President Trump’s proposed budget in the next fiscal year calls for firm support of artificial intelligence and quantum research but makes large cuts to many other parts of the sprawling enterprise of scientific research funded by the federal government.

Only Congress has the power to enact such proposals, but if it does in this case, “the consequences for the future of our nation will be catastrophic,” said Sudip Parikh, head of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, one of the world’s largest scientific societies. “The United States will no longer be in the global race” for leadership in research and development, he added. “We will have lost it.”

Continue reading “Science backers say proposed federal research cuts pose dire risks.”

The New York Times, April 30, 2025

Link

Consciousness may be a mystery, but that doesn’t mean that neuroscientists don’t have any explanations for it. Far from it.

“In the field of consciousness, there are already so many theories that we don’t need more theories,” said Oscar Ferrante, a neuroscientist at the University of Birmingham.

Continue reading “Two Theories of Consciousness Faced Off. The Ref Took a Beating.”