In the past couple weeks, I’ve been checking back in with a couple of my favorite lines of scientific research in my New York Times column.

–Last week, I wrote about how life will (or won’t) adapt to climate change. A new experiment suggests that some species may have more potential to evolve resistance to the new conditions than previously thought. But we don’t know if that will be enough.

This is just one way in which we humans are now driving evolution in new directions. Here’s a video of a lecture I gave on the subject a few months ago at Harvard’s Arnold Arboretum:

Continue reading “Hot Flies and Mosaic Parents”

In today’s New York Times, Benedict Carey and I have a feature about two big pieces of news on the search for genes involved in psychiatric diseases. After many years of struggle, a new paper published today shows how scientists are starting to build a catalog of these genes–in this case, over 100 genes associated with schizophrenia. The paper coincides with the other big piece of news we report on: the announcement of a $650 million gift to the Broad Institute (one of the partners in the new study) from a family that has been personally affected by psychiatric diseases–the biggest gift for psychiatric research ever.

Continue reading “Searching for the Genetic Roots of Mental Illness”

Evolution is complex–does that mean it’s too complex to predict? Biologists used to leave the question to philosophers (or to philosophically-minded biologists). But in a new feature for Quanta, in a new feature for Quanta, in a new feature for Quanta, I look at cases where evolution is indeed predictable–including some upon which lives depend, such as the evolution of the flu and cancer.

Continue reading “Can We Forecast Evolution?”

ANOPHELES STEPHENSI. CREDIT: CDC

There’s a new way to edit DNA. It’s called CRISPR, and it’s taking science by storm. Its versatility and speed have led scientists to explore all sorts of uses for it. One of the most radical ideas--proposed today in a pair of papers–is to use it to alter the DNA of species we want to get rid of. Think of malaria-bearing mosquitoes, bat-killing fungi, and the like. It’s a provocative idea, but does it threaten to do more harm than good? I take a look at the issue in my new “Matter” column for the New York Times. Check it out.

 

Originally published July 17, 2014. Copyright 2014 Carl Zimmer.