Posted by Carl Zimmer

The Atavist is no stranger to this site. In fact, we’ve set up a category for the ebooks that come from this innovative ebook publisher. Yesterday, The New York Times‘s David Carr broke the news that it has gotten $1.5 million in seed money from some of the biggest names in technology, such as Eric Schmidt of Google. So this afternoon I Skyped Evan Ratliff, the chief executive of the Atavist, to talk about how they do what they do, why they end up publishing so much science, and what lies in the future for their operation. I recorded our Skype conversation on a Macbook that’s really only good these days as a walkway tile. But for some reason the video file turned out to be fairly viewable, and the audio very audible (I think an office dog chimes in late in the conversation). So I’ve uploaded it to YouTube and embedded it below. I’ve posted the audio below, too.

If you’re fonder of the written word (which would make eminent sense for people who come to this site), I can give you the lowdown. Ratliff comes to the Atavist as a seasoned journalist, writing mostly about technology and science. Like many journalists, he loved writing long pieces but struggled to find many opportunities to write them. He then had something of an epiphany while working on a story for Wired for which he vanished and dared readers to find him. He took a lot of video while on the run, which he wished he could have used somehow. And he also did a lot of promotion for the story on television, which got him thinking about what it would be like to get a royalty every time someone read his article.

As Ratliff describes it, he groused about it until his friend Nicholas Thompson, then at Wired and now at newyorker.com, suggested they do something about it. So they co-founded a company to publish long-form nonfiction augmented with video, audio, maps, timelines, and other features.

The Atavist and a few other publishers have recognized the value of stories that used to fall between the cracks. Magazines may put a ceiling on stories at 5,000 words, while book publishers may set a floor at 50,000 words. But that doesn’t mean that a 20,000-word story is, by definition, a bad story. In fact, it can be quite compelling. Making a place like the Atavist work also requires good taste and an ability to see the potential for a story where other editors might see a wall of boredom. Some of the Atavist’s most successful stories started out in life as magazine stories that were rejected for what, in hindsight, can only be called stupid reasons.

I asked Ratliff to take me through the production of a piece. The pace feels more like a newspaper office than a book publisher. To hit those frantic deadlines, the Atavist depends on its software. Ratliff & Co. can put their text and other elements into the software, and out come files ready for the many venues where they sell their pieces, from Amazon’s Kindle Store (straight text only) to their app on the iPhone or iPad, where all the bells and whistles can play at maximum volume.

Science is heavily represented at the Atavist, and it’s not just due to the journalistic background of its founders. Science often benefits from great illustrations, and video–when used judiciously–is the best illustration of all. Science also does well at length–there’s room to tell a great narrative and weave in the concepts that the scientists in the story are exploring.

As Ratliff explained in our talk, the software has shown great value of its own. The Atavist has licensed it out to conventional publishers and other companies, and this summer they’re going to roll out a public version anyone can use to self-publish their own books. The Atavist is also going to offer a marketplace that may resemble a kind of literary Etsy. As I mentioned in our talk, Etsy doesn’t market its own clothes. Ratliff admitted that was a tricky canyon for the Atavist to navigate. But he feels it’s worth the trip, because he’s become a strong believer in people getting hold of tools to make interesting stories.

I expect some of those stories will make their way over here.

Audio:

Video:

Carl Zimmer writes frequently about science for the New York Times and is the author of 13 books, including A Planet of Viruses

On April 4, the Pew Research Center's released an extensive report on the country's e-reading habits as part of its Internet and American Life project. It is, as is oftentimes the case with Pew reports, quite interesting and exceedingly bland. (You can find an introduction to the Pew report here; the full report is also available online or as a free download.) 

Which gave me an idea: Why not tap into our collective brainpower and organize a roundtable? Which is exactly what I did. This is the final entry in a three-part series; the first entry, "Crap futurism, pleasure reading, and DRM," ran on Monday, and "Walled gardens, cruftiness, and a race to the bottom" ran yesterday.

My role was mainly one of gentle facilitation; the other participants are the inimitable Mr. Zimmer, who, in addition to being the DtU fall guy, has extensive experience in publishing both "traditional" and e-books; Maia Szalavitz, who has written about memory and e-books; and io9's Annalee Newitz, who was already a e-reader vet by the time the Kindle came on the scene. Hope you all had as much fun as we had.  –Seth Mnookin

Annalee: I wanted to return to a question that Maia raised, which is whether e-books will become a way for students to pirate textbooks. This interested me because one of the main ways I currently use my iPad is to hold (in the Kindle app, natch) all the books and articles I’m using to research my current book project.

Continue reading “Pirates, parties, pulps, and PowerPoint: Part 3 of a Download the Universe roundtable on e-reading”

On April 4, the Pew Research Center's released an extensive report on the country's e-reading habits as part of its Internet and American Life project. It is, as is oftentimes the case with Pew reports, quite interesting and exceedingly bland. (You can find an introduction to the Pew report here; the full report is also available online or as a free download.) 

Which gave me an idea: Why not tap into our collective brainpower and organize a roundtable? Which is exactly what I did. Today's entry is the second in a three-part series; the first entry, "Crap futurism, pleasure reading, and DRM," ran yesterday.

My role was mainly one of gentle facilitation; the other participants are the inimitable Mr. Zimmer, who, in addition to being the DtU fall guy, has extensive experience in publishing both "traditional" and e-books; Maia Szalavitz, who has written about memory and e-books; and io9's Annalee Newitz, who was already a e-reader vet by the time the Kindle came on the scene. The final entry in the series will run tomorrow. Enjoy!   –Seth Mnookin

Seth: Carl, as someone who has written “traditional” print books and dedicated e-books, I’m curious if your thoughts about Amazon changed over the past few years–because mine definitely have. David Carr’s recent column in the Times, about how the DOJ should have gone after Amazon, not Apple, if it wanted to take on a monopoly threatening the book business, is just the latest data point that has me wondering whether I’m contributing to my own demise by patronizing Bezos’s warehouse of goodies.

Continue reading “Walled gardens, cruftiness, and a race to the bottom: Part 2 of a Download the Universe Roundtable on E-Reading”

On April 4, the Pew Research Center's released an extensive report on the country's e-reading habits as part of its Internet and American Life project. It is, as is oftentimes the case with Pew reports, quite interesting and exceedingly bland. (You can find an introduction to the Pew report here; the full report is also available online or as a free download.) 

Which gave me an idea: Why not tap into our collective brainpower and organize a roundtable? My role was mainly one of gentle facilitation; the other participants are the inimitable Mr. Zimmer, who, in addition to being the DtU fall guy, has extensive experience in publishing both "traditional" and e-books; Maia Szalavitz, who has written about memory and e-books; and io9's Annalee Newitz, who was already a e-reader vet by the time the Kindle came on the scene. The conversation will be broken into three parts; the first entry is below.   –Seth Mnookin

Continue reading “Crap futurism, pleasure reading, and DRM: Part 1 of a Download the Universe Roundtable on E-Reading”

Bats diagramBats! Furry Fliers of the Night. 2012. by Mary Kay Carson. Published by Bookerella. iPad. Publisher's page

Reviewed by Carl Zimmer

 

Yesterday my daughters–Charlotte, 10, and Veronica, 8–were playing some inscrutable game involving two beach balls and running in and out of the house. As they roared through my office, I called out.

"Veronica," I said. "Do you want to read something?"

She stopped. "What?" she asked. There was no eagerness in her voice.

Veronica is always a bit suspicious when I ask her this question, which I often do. She doesn't like to have good-for-you things foisted on her. But she also knows that from time to time, I may have something for her that's actually worth reading. Something involving Egyptian mummies, usually, or the sinking of the Titanic.

"I want to find out what you think about this. It's a book you read on an iPad."

Veronica looked at my iPad as I flipped open the cover and switch on the power.

"Is it a book or an app?" she asked.

Good Lord, I thought. When did this kid become a new media maven?

Just a couple days earlier, I had been reading an interesting article by Adam Penenberg in Fast Company that raised this question. Honestly–the first line of the article is, "When is a book an app and an app a book?"

Continue reading “Look Up In The Sky! It’s A Book! It’s An App! It’s a Bat!”