Switzerland coverSwitzerland, 
by Sir Frank Fox.
 

Originally published by Adam and Charles Black in 1914. Published by Project Gutenberg for Kindle and in other file types. Free.

Reviewed by Veronique Greenwood

If you limit yourself to reading just
the ebooks available for free on the internet, as I have been doing
lately, you wind up inhabiting the world prior to 1923. American
copyright laws are complicated
, but books published before that
magical year, 90 years prior to this one, are in the public domain. It's about as close to time travel as you can reasonably get.

To really immerse yourself in the era, you
can read the travelogues of Sir Frank Fox, a kind of early-twentieth
century Bill Bryson. An Australian journalist who spent much of his
life reporting for newspapers in London, he wrote books about the
natural history, geography, and ethnography of various lands, and
there are five of them—on Australia, Bulgaria, England, the Balkan
Peninsula, and Switzerland—available at Project Gutenberg for free.
For this review, I read Switzerland,
published in 1914.

As a rule, one of the risks of
inhabiting this pre-1923 world is drowning in a sea of unnecessary
words. Today the fashion is to write with extreme clarity,
projecting each scene into the reader's mind as if he or she were
watching a movie, and to snip out all excess verbiage. Not a hundred
years ago—reading Fox is a bit like codebreaking, with sentences
that sometimes encompass eleven or twelve clauses and words that
aren't used much anymore, like “waggish” and “beneficient.”
His very first chapter includes a hilariously lengthy Socratic
dialogue rebutting the idea that mountain people are more virtuous
and vigorous than lowlanders, owing to some magical quality of the
mountain air—not the introduction that a modern writer would use,
but curiously charming nevertheless, once you adjust your ear to his
style.

It's worth noting, too, that this
pre-1923 world as represented by its literature is a pretty
Anglocentric one. Fox's readers were British subjects, or former
British subjects, so perhaps it's no surprise that he is eager to
caricature “the Swiss race” and make his own sweeping
generalizations about why they are the way they are, while
simultaneously tearing down other sentimental depictions. And the
chapter on Swiss prehistory is threaded with regular assertions that
human society is on an ever-upward trend, with pathetic (yet noble)
nomads at the bottom and the 1914 European at the crest.

But it's an interesting experience,
revisiting the literary fashions and the inherited wisdom of a time
not so long ago. To the modern reader interested in geography and
ethnography, and not afraid to put on a monocle and go along for the
ride, Switzerland is
fun reading. The prehistory chapter includes a great summary of what
was known about the villages-on-stilts that fringed many Swiss lakes
in Celtic times. The chapter on local writers includes an anecdote
about the time Byron, visiting the fashionable salons along Lake
Geneva, attempted to scandalize polite society as he had in Britain,
and failed. Apparently the Swiss found him tedious. And the chapter
on the Alps, along with a compact treatise on the formation and decay
of mountains, includes this note:

“M.
Charles Rabot [a geographer and mountaineer] asserts that the
glaciers in Argentina are also retreating, and surmises, from data
perhaps not so well established, that there has been a general
retreat of glaciers during the last half of the nineteenth century
throughout Spitzenbergen, Iceland, Cetnral Asia, and Alaska. He
suggests that the cause is a present tendency towards equalisation
of the earth's temperature. Others more boldly affirm that the Swiss
glaciers, as well as other great ice masses existing on the globe,
are remnants of the last Ice Age, and are all doomed to disappear as
the cycle works round for the full heat of the next Warm Age. But the
disappearance, if it is to come, will not come quickly, and the doom
of ice-climbing in Switzerland is too remote a threat to disturb the
Alpinist.”

That passage falls with quite a
different meaning on our ears today, and one of the great pleasures
of reading Fox is looking for these harmonies and dissonances, the
moments that reveal how much has stayed the same and how much has
changed. If that sounds like fun to you, then there's a cache of free
ebooks waiting for you on Fox's Gutenberg author page.

Happy time-traveling.

 

 


HeadshotVeronique
Greenwood is a former staff writer at DISCOVER Magazine. She writes
about everything from caffeine
chemistry
to cold
cures
to Jelly
Belly flavors
, and her work has appeared in
Scientific American,
TIME.com, TheAtlantic.com, and others. Follow her on Twitter
here.

 


Ghostcell"The Ghost in the Cell," by Scott C. Johnson. Published by Matter. Available via WebePub, Kindle. $.99.

Reviewed by Annalee Newitz

It's a prize that scientists have sought since the early nineteenth century: a biological marker that predicts violent behavior in humans. In the 1830s, phrenologists believed head bumps could reveal a criminal personality — often, prostitutes and the poor were said to have bumps that marked them as deviants from birth. But today, it seems this pursuit may have moved beyond the realm of pseudoscience.

Thanks to recent discoveries, we have evidence that the genes of abused children are marked by the experience. Over time, these effects leave them prone to depression and make it harder for them to control their violent impulses. Could we be on the cusp of discovering a scientific approach to a social problem? In an essay for Matter magazine, former war correspondent Scott C. Johnson suggests that we are. Unfortunately, Johnson fails spectacularly to explain the complexity of this problem, and winds up telling a story that distorts both the science and the reality of abuse in many people's lives.

Continue reading “The Wrong Way to Write about Epigenetics and Violence”


Honor thy symbiontsHonor Thy Symbionts
, by Jeff Leach. Kindle

Guest review by Kevin Bonham

In 2003, the Human Genome Project–an effort to sequence every gene in a human being–was completed. The success, announced to great fanfare, was supposed to herald a new era in health care. Unfortunately, the promises of personalized medicine, in which treatments are tied to a person's genetic sequence, have not yet come to fruition. A few of the reasons for this are obvious (at least in hindsight). Knowing the location and sequence of a gene is one thing, knowing what it does is quite another. And understanding the role that a gene or gene variant plays in a disease, especially when many afflictions are influenced by tens or hundreds of genes, is even harder.

Complicating matters further is the re-emerging realization that genes are not destiny, and now many new "-omics" projects are beginning to gain attention. From the transcriptome (what genes are actually expressed), to the proteome (proteins and protein modification), to the epigenome (modifications of the DNA that regulate gene expression), more and more researchers are attempting large-scale analysis of entire biological systems and trying to extract meaningful information from enormous data sets. In his new ebook, Honor Thy Symbionts, Jeff Leach aims to tackle what is, in my opinion, the most fascinating of these new -omics revolutions: The Human Microbiome Project.

I desperately wanted to like Leach's book. Even though I've repeatedly heard the refrains, "There are 10 times more bacteria cells in your body than human cells," and "There are 100 times more bacterial genes in your gut than there are human genes," and "Bacteria account for 5 to 10 percent of your body mass," these facts never cease to amaze me. And I've been to enough microbiome-related research talks to know that the microscopic bugs that live in our guts can have profound impacts on our health–from metabolic disorders and type-II diabetes to multiple sclerosis and inflammatory bowel disease. The microbiome deserves a book-length discussion, but Honor Thy Symbionts falls short.

Problems

Problem 1 (I think this is the underlying reason for all of this book's problems): It's not a book, it's a collection of "essays" that are really just blog posts.

In fact, you can go to Leach's website and read almost all of the "chapters" for free on his blog. As I read his alleged book on my Kindle, it was abundantly clear that Leach simply did a large-scale copy-paste, without much additional effort. Spelling and grammatical errors abound, and phrases like "In a series of blog posts starting with this one[…]" only serve to call attention to the fact that I paid three dollars to download something I could just as easily have read on the Internet for free. In one chapter, the text refers to a graph that apparently didn't make it in the migration to Kindle. And since each chapter is really just a blog post, there's no cohesive narrative to tie the book together. Even the unifying "theme" of the microbiome is misleading, since several of the chapters don't even mention microbes.

 

Problem 2: A lot of the science is overstated.

Throughout this book, I had the same feeling of professional scientific unease I get when reading Malcolm Gladwell, without the benefit of Gladwell's ability to spin a narrative. For instance: 

Though improved hygiene has many benefits, scrubbing soil from our bodies and food has thrown our immune system into an over reactive tailspin and is responsible for the skyrocketing increase in allergies and autoimmune disease.

There are several lines of evidence suggesting that hygiene may increase the risk for many inflammatory disorders, but there are plenty of other factors that may play a role, and a marginal increase in risk is a far cry from an "over reactive tailspin."

In another case, Leach describes compelling research suggesting that fiber intake can alter the levels of certain types of microbes. But then he leaps to a prescription how many grams of fiber we should eat each day (an amount significantly higher than current nutritional guidelines).

And in yet another case, Leach spends several pages discussing research on the protein consumption of spider monkeys. Based on this study, he draws conclusions about everything from human diets to agribusiness, sociology and the economics of poverty and health, finally concluding the chapter by pointing out that

This all assumes, of course, that the protein leverage theory plays any role in all of this. Maybe it doesn’t.

At least he admits the ambiguity this time. But then why all the self-assured conclusions? At times I wanted to pull my hair out.

Further complicating this scientific over-reach is Leach's failure to cite the research he's referring to. There's an extensive collection of references at the back of the book, but no link within the text to the reference itself. This seems to be another symptom of copy-pasting from a blog post. The blog posts have web links, but they were apparently were stripped out when the conversion was made.

Problem 3:  Inconsistency of style and complexity.

Leach jumps back and forth from lofty rhetoric:

It is at this interface between the terra firma of our evolutionary past and the enhanced material standard of living[…]

to colloquialisms that border on inanity. Sometimes he makes the jump within a single sentence: 

In just a few thousand centuries, our kind has gone from nesting in trees, to making stone tools and digging roots, to kindling fires, to subduing flora and fauna, to erecting massive cities, and finally to downloading Angry Birds over 1 billion times (and counting).

Leach routinely throws in random and unnecessary digs at creationists. At one he point calls health-care workers who recommend baby formula "predatory." I found the constant movement between grandiosity and link-bait trolling to be jarring. 

Leach also routinely mixes lay-accessible and jargon-laden writing. I know what 16S ribosomal RNA and shotgun pyrosequencing (misspelled as prosequencing) are, but I doubt the target audience of this book will. In some cases, the jargon is useful and adequately explained, but in others it just seems like Leach is trying to show off.

Redeeming Qualities

Despite these glaring problems, I don't think Leach should be written off entirely. A lot of the science he talks about is interesting and important. Our obsession with cleanliness probably does play some role in the increased prevalence of allergies and autoimmunity, even if it's not the only cause. People probably should be eating more fiber, even if we can't make a specific grams/day recommendation. The cheap cost of corn and expense of protein probably explains at least a portion of the paradoxical association of poverty and obesity, even if we can't draw a straight line between spider monkey diets and our own. And the main thesis of this book, that our dietary decisions need to be increasingly informed by our emerging understanding microbiome, is almost certainly correct.

Strangely, Leach himself makes much the same point in the introduction to this book.

While researchers are cautious and right not to oversell the microbiome (much work is still needed to confirm causation for many ailments), the direct or indirect implication of microbes in a staggering number of ailments and diseases of the modern world, reinforces that we are on the cusp of a paradigm shift from the orthodox notions of health and disease.

It's a shame that the author failed to exercise some of that caution himself.

Final Verdict

 There are too many problems for me to recommend this book. Prepare an enormous grain of salt and head over to Leach's blog instead. You'll get most of the same material, including web links to the relevant research so you can fact check any claims that seem overwrought. Meanwhile, I will anxiously await a book that tackles the microbiome and does justice to this amazing new field of research.

 

10.27.1KevinBonham16Kevin Bonham is a graduate student studying the immune system at Harvard University. He blogs about microbes and the immune system at We, Beasties on the Scienceblogs network.